Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re. ROE
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:32:54 EDT
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] ANN at 8% loss "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Katherine:
Thanks, Katherine.
Very good point (comparing R&D's across the industry, and then, if they
are similar, compare each ROE (although it must be considered that ROE could
decline due to equity increases [ie. which means to me that the big boys, ie.
the institutional money, want a piece of the pie].
But I do want to thank you for replying, and adding your own, intriguing,
Katherinish spin (spin, of course, in a good, non-O' Reileyish, way).
jans
In a message dated 7/11/2003 12:22:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
kmalm@earthlink.net writes:
<< Say that in general, R&D expenses are high across all companies in the
industry, then it is far more useful to look at the ROE's of all companies within
the same industry and see how a particular candidate tracks *in comparison.*
>>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] ANN at 8% loss "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]