[CANSLIM] 52-weeks hi/low versus industry group ranking

From: Tomas <tomas986@yahoo.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] 52-weeks hi/low versus industry group ranking
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:07:38 -0700 (PDT)

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] 52-weeks hi/low versus industry group ranking Tomas
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] AAII letter to the editor "Lois"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] 52-weeks hi/low versus industry group ranking "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] 52-weeks hi/low versus industry group ranking "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

I noticed that there is a big discrepancy between the
52-weeks hi/low and industry group ranking in IBD. 
Looks like Internet-Content group has been ranked 1
for for the last few weeks.  However, most of the
stocks making new highs report in the 52-weeks hi/low
is in the medical, banks and business svc groups.  Why
is that?  Is the group ranking way off?

Regards,
tomas

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.