From: Tomas <tomas986@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Market Trend Charts Tomas
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today Hong Hsu
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today Tomas
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I would have to agree with Frik. I noticed a lot of people try to use CS, but only a portion of it (i.e. good technical but not good fundies). Sometimes I see people asking opinions on a particular stock and when I look at it, there is no way in he** that the stock is a CS candidate. This event does not happen as often on this list as on another list that I subscribed to. tomas - --- Frik Lebom <talkcanslim@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > IMHO a real CANSLIM stock is not just a stock that > have a nice technical > "entry point". I truly believe a canslim investor > should look for powerful > growth stocks that have strength to drive the price > higher. In the case of > HUM, the 1st and foremost fundamental consideration, > "C" in CANSLIM is > simply not there. Not only the stock did not meet > the 25% recent quarter > increase in EPS, it actually declined(for 2 > consecutive quarters comparing > to same quarter previous year). WON also try to look > for stocks that have > good ROE and profit margin, in HUM's case, both of > these figures are not up > to mark too.(I personally do not blindly chase a > profit margin of 18% like > WON suggest, but it really seem too low in this > case,same thing with ROE..) > > Although I always get tempted to stocks that show a > good "technical entry > point", I just try to remind myself I am a CANSLIM > investor, not a "cup with > handle" investor. A good cup with handle stock might > be able to show > nearterm increase in stock price but in my opinion a > trueCANSLIM stock have > a much higher chance to be my BIG winner. > > Thanks, > > Frik > > > >From: Bill Triffet <btriffet@earthlink.net> > >Reply-To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO > Failures Today > >Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT) > > > >Might I add the fundies on HUM were on the weak > side for my taste. Handle > >was sloping up as well. > > > >Most of the recent BO's have had low fundies. Could > be a sign? > > > >-- > >Bill > > > > >>For the group: > > > >I got stopped out today on two BO purchases: HUM > and BSTE. I'll share my > >"lessons learned" with the group so that hopefully > someone will benefit > >from > >my loss: > > > >I had done my usual due diligence on both stocks > and had given them a > >"green light with reservations". Turns out I should > have given more > >credence to > >the "with reservations" part. Upon further > examination, I see that high > >institutional ownership and strange action in the > handle are common in both > >stocks as shown below: > > > >HUM: > >Institutional Ownership = 68% > >Chart action = High volume in handle > > > >BSTE: > >Institutional Ownership = 99% > >Chart action = Wedging action in handle > > > >High institutional ownership places an equity at > the mercy of institutions > >who can sell of huge chunks at any given time and > therefore put your > >purchase in a free fall. High volume in the handle > does not prove the > >sellers > >are "drying up" to allow the stock to move upward. > The wedging action in > >the > >handle is a sell signal - a bad signal just before > an expected breakout. > > > >These are my observations from my post-mortem of > these two purchases. If > >anyone else sees additional items, or disagrees > with my reasoning above, > >I'd > >love to hear your comments.<< > ><< MESSAGE.HTML >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months > FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Market Trend Charts Tomas
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today Hong Hsu
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today Tomas
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Lessons Learned - 2 BO Failures Today "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]