From: "Charles & Lois Layne" <lelayne@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:32:02 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit Hong Hsu
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
- ----- Original Message ----- > > I got a dumb question. Even you can put IBD subscription and > breakoutwatch.com online service fee into Schedule A as investor, is it > worth to give up Standard Deduction? For married filling jointly, the > standard deduction is $7,850. Can you put partial of your mortgage or > rent onto Schedule A as investment expenses? If not, what is big > chunk of miscellaneous itemized deduction? > I hope it's not a dumb question. It becomes worthwhile itemizing on schedule A if applicable deductions exceed the standard deduction. That's the bottom line. Typically, if a taxpayer does not have some of the "biggies" on sched A, such as deductible mortgage interest, then it is probably not worth the effort figuring those expenses that are subject to the limits since there just won't be enough to exceed the standard deduction. There are rules for "home office" use, but they can become so ponderous to track and calculate that the payoff is not worth the effort. For instance, how many people use a home office/workspace ONLY for the purpose of generating income? Your computer, file cabinets, desk drawers, etc. contain ONLY those things needed to invest and/or conduct some other income producing business? As stated, sched A is useful only to the extent that total itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction. If that's the case, then by all means, try to capture all legitimate expenses - even those subject to a limit such as out of pocket medical expenses. Sched A is also useful if one is using a filing status that disallows the standard deduction (married filing single, I believe) or if the taxpayer elects not to take the standard deduction because of some tax advantage at the state income tax level (not usual, but I have heard of it; depends on the state tax laws). As with all tax issues, contact with a tax professional is always recommended for issues that are difficult to resolve. Chuck Layne - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit Hong Hsu
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Deduction Subject to 2% Limit "Robert Gammon"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]