Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling


From: "Rolf Hertenstein" <rolfh@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:18:26 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_045C_01C3625E.29A171C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey DMC -

What are the dates of your double-bottom bottoms?  My guess is you're =
looking at a shorter timeframe (the 8 weeks you mention?) than I am.

I was looking at a daily SP-500 chart over 2 years and can imagine an =
18-month CWH. Left-side of cup about March 2002, handle last 8 weeks.  =
DOW and NASD look similar.

Problems with this picture:
1. Longer-term view (back to 1999 or so) has the left side cup as a blip =
on a longer downtrend.
2. Even if it is a CWH, doesn't mean it'll resolve to the upside.

 Rolf
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: DMC197807=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:42 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling


  Ian,

  What I see here (putting aside the letter writers, pundits, etc.) is a =
market which has extremely low volatility and which has gone nowhere but =
sideways to down for about 8 weeks.  If you pull up a daily on the SPX =
you can see a double top and then a trailing off.  The VIX chart is =
extremely unusual in its low leveling off.  It's like a market that has =
been drugged.

  Will it break out to the topside or the bottomside?  Or, more =
dangerously, will it break out sharply to the topside to lure all the =
little bugs into the spider's web and then break down like nobody's =
business?  I don't know, obviously, or I'd be filthy rich, but it seems =
to me that we are in the inflection zone for something to happen.

  One thing I've learned is that it won't be a top until the bears have =
been pretty much completely shaken out (not yet, imho), just as it's =
almost never a great bottom until people are terrified to commit one =
more dime to the market, in fact, they are exiting the market in droves. =
 July 2002 was a classic case of bulls just throwing in the towel and we =
had a bottom.  March 2000 was a classic case of bears (or just plain =
logical thinkers) just giving up--there were articles about Warren =
Buffet being washed up, Julian Robertson closed his fund.

  Since I don't see the bears giving up quite yet, and the bulls =
complacent, I'm concerned that we may have some vicious spikes coming =
our way, but in which order and which direction, I'm not sure.

  DMC
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Ian=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:45 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling


    Hi DMC:

    One thing I find a little ironic here is that most of the pundits =
(the ones that I come across anyhow, clearly a non-scientific sample =
size) appear to be bearish, because everyone is bullish. Doesn't that =
make everyone really bearish, allowing us to continue to climb the wall =
of worry?

    Cheers,

    Ian



- ------=_NextPart_000_045C_01C3625E.29A171C0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hey DMC -</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What are the dates of your =
double-bottom=20
bottoms?&nbsp; My guess is you're looking at a shorter timeframe (the 8 =
weeks=20
you mention?) than I am.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I was looking at&nbsp;a daily SP-500 =
chart over 2=20
years and can imagine an 18-month CWH. Left-side of cup about March =
2002, handle=20
last 8 weeks.&nbsp;&nbsp;DOW and NASD look similar.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Problems with this =
picture:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1. Longer-term view (back to 1999 or =
so) has the=20
left side cup&nbsp;as a blip on&nbsp;a longer downtrend.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>2. Even if it is a CWH, doesn't mean =
it'll resolve=20
to the upside.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;Rolf</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Ddmc197807@comcast.net=20
  href=3D"mailto:dmc197807@comcast.net">DMC197807</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 14, 2003 =
10:42=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] for =
Short=20
  Selling</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ian,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What I see here (putting aside the =
letter=20
  writers, pundits, etc.) is a market which has extremely low volatility =
and=20
  which has gone nowhere but sideways to down for about 8 weeks.&nbsp; =
If you=20
  pull up a daily on the SPX you can see a double top and then a =
trailing=20
  off.&nbsp; The VIX chart is extremely unusual in its low leveling =
off.&nbsp;=20
  It's like a market that has been drugged.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Will it break out to the topside or =
the=20
  bottomside?&nbsp; Or, more dangerously, will it break out sharply to =
the=20
  topside to lure all the little bugs into the spider's web and then =
break down=20
  like nobody's business?&nbsp; I don't know, obviously, or I'd be =
filthy rich,=20
  but it seems to me that we are in the inflection zone for something to =

  happen.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>One thing I've learned is that it =
won't be a top=20
  until the bears have been pretty much completely shaken out (not yet, =
imho),=20
  just as it's almost never a great bottom until people are terrified to =
commit=20
  one more dime to the market, in fact, they are exiting the market in=20
  droves.&nbsp; July 2002 was a classic case of bulls just throwing in =
the towel=20
  and we had a bottom.&nbsp; March 2000 was a classic case of bears (or =
just=20
  plain logical thinkers) just giving up--there were articles about =
Warren=20
  Buffet being washed up, Julian Robertson closed his fund.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Since I don't see the bears giving up =
quite yet,=20
  and the bulls complacent, I'm concerned that we may have some vicious =
spikes=20
  coming our way, but in which order and which direction, I'm not=20
  sure.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DMC</FONT></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 14, =
2003 9:45=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] for =
Short=20
    Selling</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi DMC:</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>One thing I find a little ironic here is that =
most of=20
    the&nbsp;pundits (the ones that I come across anyhow, clearly a=20
    non-scientific sample size) appear to be bearish, because everyone =
is=20
    bullish. Doesn't that make everyone really bearish, allowing us to =
continue=20
    to climb the wall of worry?</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Cheers,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_045C_01C3625E.29A171C0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] for Short Selling "DMC197807"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.