From: "Matt Robinson" <mhr2x@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NVLS
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 09:05:05 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NVLS "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NVLS "james sullivan"
Next in Thread: [CANSLIM] NVLS SKutney@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Earnings By Quarter
94 95 96 97 98 99
00
Mar .08 .16 .26 .15 .20 .08 .45
Jun .10 .19 .27 .17 .15 .10
Sep .13 .21 .26 .19 .07 .18
Dec .15 .24 .17 .21 .08 .27
Year .45 .80 .95 .72 .50 .64
Rev 461.7 534 518.8 592.7
274.1 (Q1)
These are the numbers I found
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Alexander T <alexbus@mail.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:31 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] NVLS
> Can someone confirm this?
> The data I have on NVLS is this:
>
> Years: 1999, 98, 97, 96
>
> EPS
> 0.64 0.50 (0.96) 0.95
>
> ROE
> 10 14 N/E 25.2
>
> ROA
> 8.4 9.6 (19.4) 20.4
>
> So, looking at these figures, we actually see that return on equity and
> assets is actually decreasing (from 98 to 99). As for EPS, even though
98 -
> 99 EPS is up, it's still nowhere the level of 1996.
>
> I believe WON mentions that one year spike down in EPS is ok, as long as
> next year earnings recover and beat the levels set a year before the
spike.
>
> NVLS - Industry seems to be one of the leading ones in this market, and
> technicals look good as well.
>
> So based on this, does anyone agree/disagree with my analysis and
conclusion
> that based on fundamentals this is not 100% canslim ? I hope I had
> fundamnetal figures right.
>
> Thanks !
>
> ______________________________________________
> FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>
> -
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
- -
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NVLS "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NVLS "james sullivan"
Next in Thread: [CANSLIM] NVLS SKutney@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]