Re: Disney's controversy


From: Bill La Mar <blamar@dialnet.net>
Subject: Re: Disney's controversy
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 10:36:16 -0500

Next Article (by Subject): High income, low risk? :-) "Melinda Johannes"
Previous Article (by Subject): Disney's controversy Allan Spring
Top of Thread: Disney's controversy Allan Spring
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Allan Spring wrote:

> >>      First of all - I disagree with you.   Anyone who thinks taxes
> and
> >>      government have nothing to do with money and finances is not
> rational.
> >>      If you can't handle a little disagreement - try
> http://www.disney.com.
>
> >With the battle Disney has because of their allowance of influence by
> >homosexuals, this company is not the uncontroversial company it once
> >was.    :)
>
> Won't it be a great day when we have a society where it will be
> considered uncontroversial and downright positive to not be influenced
> by homophobes?

Won't it be a great day when we have a society where it will be
considered uncontroversial and downright positive to not be influenced
by homo-philo activists?

<editor's note:  This thread ends right here...>




- -

Next Article (by Subject): High income, low risk? :-) "Melinda Johannes"
Previous Article (by Subject): Disney's controversy Allan Spring
Top of Thread: Disney's controversy Allan Spring
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.