Blue MonkeyYear: 1987 Director: William Fruet Written by: George Goldsmith Threat: Bug Weapon of Choice: Laser |
Other movies in this series:
None
Rish Outfield's reviews
This title ... I shudder every time I hear it. In a Worst Movie Titles Ever
list, this would place one rung below Attack of the Killer Tomatoes. But
in the context of the film ... it still sucks. This 'film' was dull,
slow-moving, plodding, irritatingly high on pointless subplots, silly,
stupid, pick your adjective. The kids got on my nerves like crazy. I slept
through half of it, and wanted to sleep through the rest. This was one of
the only Canadian horror films we've reviewed (we've stayed away from
Cronenberg so far), so maybe I just didn't get it. Nahh, that's not it. The
damn bug doesn't show its face until the last half-hour, and it is
okay-looking. A definite case of too little, too late. Hey, I liked
Lifeforce as much as anybody, but Steve Railsbeck should never work again.
A BAD movie.
Best Scare: Something with the bug . . . maybe.
I'd Recommend It To: Only those who don't hate the title. All one of you.
The tyranist's thoughts
This is really just a typical big bug caused by man screwing up again movie. It has a lot of inherent problems that come
along with the subgenre, and it never really manages to correct any of them. We never see the bug clear enough to get to
"Ooh" and "Aah" at it. The characters are pretty typical (including some asinine comic relief). All in all, this movie was
pretty poor. There was just a whole lot of really forgettable stuff. I have seen much better movies in this subgenre and
the only thing that really recommends this one is the title. We picked it up knowing that it would have two skulls right
there.
Made in Canada, this movie either misses American humor or just doesn't even try. As for the horror elements, I have seen
much better sequences of similar mood and intent in Aliens. My last complaint probably is the title. Blue Monkey.
When you find out why it is called that you may hate yourself for having picked it up. And just because there are nurses on the
cover does not mean that there is nudity inside.
Total Skulls: 23
Sequel | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
Bad execution | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ||
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower scene | ||
Car stalls or won't start | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
What the hell? | ||
x years ago . . . | ||
Dark and stormy night | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood hits camera | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending |