CandymanYear: 1992 Director: Bernard Rose Written by: Bernard Rose Threat: Ghost Weapon of Choice: Hook |
Other movies in this series:
Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh
Candyman: Day of the Dead
Rish Outfield's reviews
I found this to be quite the scary movie when I first saw it a few years ago.
In the second viewing, I found a couple of things (the setting and locale
and Virginia Madsen's performance) just as effective, but other things
lacking (Phillip Glass's always annoying two-tone musical score). Based on a
story by Clive Barker, Candyman delves into his comfortable realm of pain
and pleasure, with the almost philosophical ghost preaching about the power
of belief and the ecstasy of physical death. I've said it before, that just
ain't my cup o' tea (in fact, I don't even like tea). But I like a lot about
this movie, more than the other films based on Barker's works.
The setting of the projects/ghetto and of apartments connected through the
bathroom mirror is unique and really works. There's the rational fear of the
kind of people who populate such places, added to the irrational fear of what
might lurk within the walls. The characters are likable and believable. The
fact that everyone believes that Virginia Madsen's character Helen is the one
committing the murders is a disturbing and effective part of this film,
certainly better than Candyman's incessant "Be my victim"s.
I have, for most of my life, been terrified by the thought that I could look
in a mirror and see something standing in the room with me. I don't know
where I first saw that happen (it could be something I was born with, just as
tyranist was born afraid of moths), but it features prominently in this film
and its sequels. At times the music is very effective (mostly early on
before I realized that this was the same repetition of notes we had been
hearing the whole time), and the fear everyone has of the title character is
chilling.
But therein also lies the weak point of the film: with all we know about
Candyman by the time we actually see him, he's just not that scary. Whoa,
whoa, hear me out. Tony Todd is a formidable and striking-looking man, with
a resonating voice and a great stance, but his character, rather than being a
spectre of unholy evil, is tragic, sad, and a reminder of our shameful past.
Unlike Fred Krueger, who was the absolute WORST thing a person can be, and
paid for his crimes by vigilante justice, Candyman's atrocious act was loving
someone society said he couldn't love. He too met his fate at the hands of
vigilante justice, but instead of thinking of the vengeful ghost with
disgust, we can't help but pity him. Also in comparing him with Krueger,
what diluted Freddy's scare power was the things he said in later sequels.
Candyman, right from the get go has more chattiness than Freddy ever had, and
delivers his lengthy verses even while stalking someone. So while being
physically imposing, especially with the hook and the bees, Todd's character
creates a rainbow array of emotions, and that's less scary than it could be.
I really enjoy the idea of saying Candyman's name five times in a mirror to
get him to appear. As a young boy, we had our own ghost in the elementary
school (before it was torn down) that we'd dare one another to try and
conjure up, and it makes me wonder, who is more foolish, a cerebral adult who
chants in front of a mirror to see if spirits will show, or an imaginative
child who does the same?
I'd Recommend It To: Most modern horror fans have seen it (my own mother was
watching it the last time I visited home), but if you missed it, it's well
worth a viewing.
The tyranist's thoughts
This is easily the best (blatantly) urban legend based movie there is. It is very scary but it still takes time to discuss urban
legends, their sources and why they keep happening. Of course, when the Candyman comes, the matter of urban legend
becomes moot and suddenly the lovely Virginia Madsen is thrust into a psychotic world where she is a ghost's gate to
immortality. Cool. As you might be able to tell, I love Virginia Madsen and now I think Tony Todd has stepped up to be
one of my favorite monster men (as much as I dislike Freddy, Robert Englund is still the tops). Seeing this movie with a
bunch of friends would probably add tons to the sleepover story atmosphere. I will definitely be checking out the sequels.
Total Skulls: 12
Sequel | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | Ted Raimi | |
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
Bad execution | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ||
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower scene | ||
Car stalls or won't start | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
What the hell? | ||
x years ago . . . | ||
Dark and stormy night | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood hits camera | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending |