DeathproofYear: 2007 Director: Quentin Tarantino Written by: Quentin Tarantino Threat: Psychopath Weapon of Choice: Car Based upon: none Color/B&W/3D: Colour Language: English Country of Origin: USA |
Other movies in this series:
Planet Terror
The tyranist's thoughts
This was the second half of Grindhouse and since it was directed by Quentin
Tarantino, was also the one I was less excited about. Sometimes I really like what
Tarantino does, but most of the time, I find his movies to be a bit tedious and overly
talkative. Still, I had some hope that this one would be different just because it was
part of Grindhouse.
Stuntman Mike spends his time driving the southland looking for young girls to kill. No
reason. Just because he can. To accomplish his ends, he uses his death-proofed car.
I'd tell you what kind it is, but I'm functionally car-blind. I can barely find my own car in
the parking lot after the movie.
This really ends up being two movies about two different groups of girls that encounter
Stuntman Mike. Both segments start out with nothing but dialogue that seems endless
and trite and boring. Eventually they break into a bit of action that makes it all worth it
though. The first segment felt both longer and more boring than the second. If it weren't
for Rose McGowan and Jordan Ladd, there wouldn't have been a single sympathetic
character. I couldn't even warm to Stuntman Mike.
In the second half though, the characters were still far too talky, but more interesting and
much more sympathetic somehow. I liked all of the girls and felt it easy to root for them.
There are even a couple moments when Stuntman Mike seems human and needs to be
pitied.
Oh, and there was a bizarre, almost inexplicable bridge between the two segments.
Between that and the complete disappearance of one of the characters half way through
the second segment, there are a lot of unanswered questions left at the end of the movie.
This was definitely inferior to its sibling,
Planet Terror, but didn't degrade the whole Grindhouse experience
enough to put me off of it completely. Tarantino made a movie that was pretty typical of
him and I enjoyed enough of it to throw it onto the small pile of Tarantino work I like.
But I do have to insist you see this in the theatre with a good crowd. It's going to
completely lose an audience that has the option of running out to check the email or hit the
head. Toward the beginning of this one it was practically daylight in the theatre as a
hundred cellphones came out and the texting of the bored commenced. Luckily the movie
gets better as it goes along and by the end everyone was into it.
Posted: April 10, 2007
Rish Outfield's reviews
Of the two of us here at the HFC, I'm the Tarantino fan and tyranist is the . . . well, I
daren't say the Quentin Tarantino hater, exactly (though that's closer to the truth than
some words, but he's not a big fan. Q.T. is a director--perhaps THE director--who is
polarizing to audiences. Either you love his work or you hate it; sitting on the fence is
not allowed.
So how is it that I ended up liking Death Proof even less than tyranist did?
We saw Grindhouse together, the night it came out, and the theatre was packed.
By the midway point, when the fake trailers were playing, we were dealt a wheelbarrow
of outrageous delight. There was laughter, there was wincing, there was momentum built
up. Then Death Proof began, and it all came to an end.
I've heard a lot of people complain that Tarantino's films are over-long, rambling, pointless,
overly brutal and violent, profane, mean-spirited, filled with puzzling and dated semi-pop
culture references, needlessly nonlinear, and overstuffed with inane, completely irrelevant
dialogue.
And except for the non-linear storytelling point, that's exactly what I thought of Death
Proof. Except that it was also boring and no fun.
It was really hard to like the first group of introduced characters. I also noticed, as other
reviews did, that every character sounded EXACTLY like Quentin Tarantino. Hence,
they all sounded like each other. And that's irritating, when, if you're like me, you go to
a movie trying to find someone to connect with, and somebody(s) to root for.
Should we have liked Stuntman Mike, our psychotic speed demon, rooted for him to kill
and kill again? If not, then why were his (potential) victims painted as such hateful, unpleasant,
soulless, self-absorbed, and worthless human beings? Hell, of the whole cast, one girl
was sympathetic only to be abandoned by the story, and another was simply because
she was played by Rosario Dawson. And Kurt Russell can outcharm a trainful of doped-up,
foul-mouthed, hard-drinking, twenty-somethings.
The dialogue scenes (all four of them) just went on and on. I've got to wonder what the
point was--if this was supposed to entertain, if it was supposed to develop character, if it
was supposed to be charming . . . or if it was just Q.T. tickling himself with lots of snappy
talk and attitude, or if there was only half and hour of story and a full movie had to be
made of it.
I saw no less than four people turn on their cellphones and start text messaging during
Death Proof. Normally, I'd be infuriated, but I wonder what I would do had I
anyone on the face of the earth to send a text message to.
There are a couple of nice moments, don't get me wrong, and the car chase and stuntwork
was pretty interesting (as was the uber-gory multi-character death scene midway through
the film), but the rest of the movie was torture on the level of what the characters go
through in Hostel. When the movie was over, I felt like getting into a scalding
shower and scrubbing an entire bar of soap away in an attempt to feel clean again.
And you know, maybe that was the point. I'm mid-way through chronicling my memories
of going to the American Grindhouse double-features at the New Beverly Cinemas in
Los Angeles, and one element that keeps coming back to me is how sleazy that place
(and the people who went there) could be. I've heard stories of the real grindhouses
of the Seventies, particularly those in New York's Times Square, and apparently all
sorts of depravity went on there, and you were lucky to go home with your person, pants,
or wallet unmolested. So maybe that's what Tarantino was going for here.
All I know is, that during Robert Rodriquez's Planet
Terror, I was having a grand old time and during this one . . . well, I wasn't.
Note: Tyranist and I debated for a while about how to review these two films, which you
could technically call one film, if you wanted to. In the end, we felt we would better serve
the two features if we treated them as two separate movies on a double bill, and give them
separate Skulls and entries. That way, if somewhere down the line, they make a second
Grindhouse (which seems unlikely given the poor box office over the weekend),
we could have a page like our "Masters of Horror" and "HorrorFest" pages, with links
to all the reviewed films in that series.
Best Scare: Stuntman Mike seemed a little scary at the beginning, but once he opened
his mouth, it became clear he was the most likable person in the room.
I'd Recommend It To: Well, here's the thing: though I hated this section of the film, the
experience of seeing Planet Terror and the fake trailers was so great that I have
to recommend the movie to anybody who likes exploitation cinema. I'm not so sure how
the movie(s) will translate to video and television release, but my guess is, a lot of people
who wait for the DVD will say to themselves, "Man, this would've been great to see in
the theatre."
Posted: April 10, 2007
Total Skulls: 13
Sequel | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ![]() |
|
Bad execution | ![]() |
|
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ![]() |
|
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower/bath scene | ||
Car stalls or won't start | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
Hallucination/Vision | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Warning goes unheeded | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
x years before/later | ![]() |
|
Flashback sequence | ||
Dark and stormy night | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ![]() |
|
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ![]() |
|
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ![]() |
|
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ![]() |
|
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ![]() ![]() |
|
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending | ![]() |
|
What the hell? | ![]() ![]() |