Near DarkYear: 1986 Director: Katheryn Bigelow Written by: Eric Red, Katheryn Bigelow Threat: Vampires Weapon of Choice: Pistol |
Rish Outfield's reviews
Hey, I loved Aliens. I mean, I LOVED it. But I didn't care for Near
Dark. You know what one of my pet peeves is about vampire movies?
Inconsistency. It bothers me that in From Dusk to Dawn guns can kill them,
but in Interview with the Vampire, not even the traditional stake can kill
them. In Innocent Blood, garlic is lethal, and in others, holy water and
fire are the big weapons. In Blade swords and guns will get them, but
crosses are useless. In Dracula crucifixes are like pepper spray to the
undead, but in Fright Night crosses only work if you believe in them. In
Bram Stoker's Dracula they can change into multiple forms, but in Bordello
of Blood they're weaker than snowmen in a sauna. In one movie, if you kill
the head vampire, all the rest get better, but in others (Salem's Lot,
etc.), they all have to be wiped out, one by one. In Lost Boys the
vampires can fly, and in The Night Flier they use a plane.
In every movie from Nosferatu to John Carpenter's Vampires, sunlight
completely destroys them, but here's Near Dark--where daylight is no problem
if you're driving in a dark car. Boasting a cool cast and neat-o James
Cameron blue lighting, this film has been very praised (the July 19th, 1999
Entertainment Weekly cited it as one of the twenty-five scariest horror films
ever), but I thought it was pretty bad. It was slow and sanitized and I
never felt for the lead character. The bloodsuckers were more annoying than
anything else herein.
Best Scare: Entertainment Weekly notwithstanding, the movie just ain't that scary.
I'd Recommend It To: Well, it's alright. I guess it's worth seeing . . . once.
The tyranist's thoughts
These have to be the dirtiest, lowest vampires I have ever seen. I believe calling them
the trailer trash of vampires wouldn't be too far off. My biggest problem with this movie
is that we are never given a side to sympathize with. Are we supposed to side with the
vampires? Are we supposed to be apalled by them? When the resolution finally came, I had
picked the wrong side. The ending is totally unbelievable. By the way, the word "vampire"
is not used in this film.
Sequel | ||
Owes everything to/rips off earlier film | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ||
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Blood hits camera | ||
Beheading | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
What the hell? |
Total Skulls: 5
Other movies in this series:
None