Secret WindowYear: 2004 Director: David Koepp Written by: David Koepp Threat: Psychopath Weapon of Choice: Screwdriver Based upon: novella - "Secret Window, Secret Garden" - Stephen King |
Other movies in this series:
None
Rish's Reviews
Novelist Mort Rainey awakens to an unpleasant visitor at his door, a man calling himself
John Shooter and claiming Rainey ripped off one of his stories. Already in the midst
of personal turmoil, Rainey finds out from the increasingly-psychotic Shooter just how hard
life can get. And stuff.
This was based on a novella in Stephen King's 1990 collection "Four Past Midnight,"
which has already seen one extraordinarily mediocre adaptation, The Langoliers,
made from it. It was a story King wrote in between Misery and The Dark
Half, and there are strong similarities to both novels (especially Dark Half).
The film also seemed to have a couple of things in common with The
Shining and Cape Fear.
The cast is small, as it mostly takes place out at Rainey's lakeside cottage. Johnny
Depp, fresh from the success of Pirates
of the Caribbean, creates another memorable, quirky performance in bringing
Mort Rainey to life. You pity him, laugh at him, cheer for him, and despair for him.
And more. The rest of the cast have less interesting things to do, though John Tuturro
is appropriately menacing as Shooter. I've never liked Maria Bello (not even in her "E.R."
days), but I liked her in this. It would've been tempting to make her the typical
monstrously bitchy adulterous wife, but for some reason, they left her sympathetic,
semi-repentant, and likable. Timothy Hutton, who also appeared in the King adaptation
The Dark Half, was sort of a douche,
pardon my French.
I've never been a big fan of the book. I always felt it was cruel and sad and not a
heck of a lot of fun. Oddly, Secret Window the film is cruel and sad and not
a heck of a lot of fun. David Koepp, who wrote Jurassic
Park, Stir of Echoes, and
Panic Room, is a very talented writer
(he also wrote Spider-man and Carlito's Way) and though I'm not as
big a fan of him as a director, he did an admirable job with what seems to be a limited
story.
Some might question if it's a horror film or not. One of the best horror movies of last
year was Identity, which has a lot in
common with this film, actually. I won't go into why, but they're both similar types of
films: what are commonly referred to as Psychological Thrillers or Suspense films.
No problem. The movie itself is not really scary (although pretty intense for a PG-13,
I think), but it is interesting.
A couple of subplots start and then end abruptly without much closure, which I imagine
is due to editing. The most interesting change is the ending. I won't spoil it by saying
that it took an unhappy ending and made it happy or took a happy ending and made it
unhappy, but it was an unexpected change in tone. Especially for a Hollywood movie.
But it's not a great film. A lot of nothing happens for a long time, and the ending is
extraorinarily unsatisfying. I've heard people say that it's worth seeing for Depp's
performance, and I'd be inclined to agree. Looking over his filmography, he's really done
a lot to pay back the Horror genre after getting his start back in Nightmare
on Elm Street. Good work, buddy.
Posted: March 23, 2004
The tyranist's thoughts
I've liked Depp for a long time and I've liked Stephen King for a long time. They finally get
together and somehow I manage to miss it in the theatre. At any rate, I got around to this one far
too late, but I'm not really all that sad about not seeing it on the big screen. In retrospect, it
just doesn't seem like it would have made a difference.
The original story isn't King's strongest, and is not even the strongest in the collection it was
published in. In fact, I thought it was pretty forgettable. Still, King's worst is better than a lot of
the crap that gets made in these days of straight-to-video horror. Add to that Depp's skill as an
actor and this is worth checking out.
I found the movie alternately moody and tense. Not that there was any real sense of danger
or even mystery (spoiled perhaps by having read the story before), but there were some effective
moments and even when the action lacked, there was always plenty to look at aesthetically. The
writing seemed relatively faithful to King and watching Mort Rainey under increasing pressure
was interesting. Really, I guess, this was just pretty middle-of-the-road.
You don't have to see this if you're a King or Johnny Depp fan, but you'd probably enjoy it a little.
I found it to be decent, but not terribly memorable and I probably won't be telling anyone that
they really ought to check it out.
Posted: August 9, 2004
Total Skulls: 12
Sequel | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
Bad execution | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ||
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower/bath scene | ||
Car stalls or won't start | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
Hallucination/Vision | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Warning goes unheeded | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
x years before/later | ||
Flashback sequence | ||
Dark and stormy night | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending | ||
What the hell? |