Thinner

Year: 1996

Director: Tom Holland

Written by: Michael McDowell, Tom Holland

Threat: Gypsy

Weapon of Choice: Curse

Based upon: novel - Thinner - Richard Bachman

IMDb page: IMDb link

      Thinner

Other movies in this series:
None

Rish Outfield's reviews
Wow, my least-favourite Stephen King story brought to life! I've found, though, that this can work in a film's advantage. The more beloved the source material, the more expectations the fans have, and the more chance the film will disappoint. In this case, I actually enjoyed the film, much to my surprise. Horror film veterans Tom Holland ( Fright Night, Child's Play) and producers Richard Rupenstein and Michael Galin (who also made Creepshow and the TV anthology series "Tales From the Darkside") know their stuff, pulled off a much better adaptation than I would've thought possible. But don't get me wrong, it was a sad, unpleasant film, just not as unpleasant as the book was.
Big fat and friendly Billy Halleck runs down an old gypsy woman with his car, and makes an enemy of her father when he gets off scot-free. He is cursed by the gypsy priest and the weight begins to come off. . .a lot.
The most striking thing about Thinner was the extraordinary makeup job by Greg Cannon. My first impression was "pretty great fat makeup." Now, of course I knew it was fat makeup (it would be pretty hard to keep that a secret), but the fact that rolly-polly Billy Halleck was played by an unknown actor, Robert John Burke, made it all the more believable that he was really a fat guy. He was very good as the lead, not just in being a "nobody," but in his acting as well. Joe Mantegna appeared as a Mafioso buddy-type character, who turned out to be more likable than anybody else. Uber-hot B-movie sexpot Kari Wuhrer appears (and keeps her shirt on, if you can believe it), as a character I found particularly loathsome. But I have issues. I smiled when I saw Steve King's cameo as Mr. Bangor, the town pharmacist, but that rather silly practice seems to better belong in the 80's, doesn't it?
The story moved at a nice pace, but it was very, very cruel and very bleak, like the book. The ending was substantially different from the one I remember in the novel, tacking on a rather overt moral: "Badness leads to more badness."
I'd Recommend It To: King fans, mostly, but they've probably already seen it.

Total Skulls: 9

Sequel
Sequel setup
Rips off earlier film
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie
Future celebrity appears
Former celebrity appears
Bad title
Bad premise
Bad acting
Bad dialogue
Bad execution
MTV Editing
OTS
Girl unnecessarily gets naked
Wanton sex skull
Death associated with sex skull
Unfulfilled promise of nudity
Characters forget about threat
Secluded location skull
Power is cut
Phone lines are cut
Someone investigates a strange noise
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door
Camera is the killer
Victims cower in front of a window/door
Victim locks self in with killer
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls
Toilet stall scene
Shower/bath scene skull
Car stalls or won't start
Cat jumps out
Fake scare
Laughable scare
Stupid discovery of corpse
Dream sequence skull
Hallucination/Vision
No one believes only witness skull
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth skull
Music detracts from scene
Death in first five minutes
x years before/later
Flashback sequence
Dark and stormy night
Killer doesn't stay dead
Killer wears a mask
Killer is in closet
Killer is in car with victim
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes
Unscary villain/monster
Beheading
Blood fountain
Blood hits camera
Poor death effect
Excessive gore
No one dies at all
Virgin survives
Geek/Nerd survives
Little kid lamely survives
Dog/Pet miraculously survives
Unresolved subplots skull
"It was all a dream" ending
Unbelievably happy ending
Unbelievably crappy ending skull
What the hell?