When A Stranger CallsYear: 2006 Director: Simon West Written by: Jake Wade Wall Threat: Psychopath Weapon of Choice: Bare Hands Based on: 1976 film of the same name |
Other movies in this series:
none
Rish's Reviews
I'm no fan of 1979's When A Stranger
Calls. It took one of the most effective--not to mention scariest--urban legends,
and totally botched it.
Well, here we are, a couple of decades later, and they've remade it.
Basically, there's a psycho who likes to call young women and scare them on the phone.
Oh, and kill them. When Jill gets a babysitting gig in a big, expensive house with windows
instead of walls, her phone just starts ringing off the hook. I didn't see any trailers, but
I saw the TV spot, and it gave away the "big twist" right there. I feel bad for anybody
that might have ruined it for.
Why would she keep answering the phone, I wonder.
Perhaps learning a little from the "failure" of the original (I say failure, but hey, it was
successful enough to spawn two sequels and this remake, so it must not have failed
hard), this film spends its entire length telling the story of the babysitter getting the spooky
phone calls (rather than just prologuing with it, like the old one did). It was well lit and
shot, from Bruckheimer alumnus Simon West. There were some semi-effective jumps (what
was up with that completely deranged statue?), and when the killer was finally revealed,
a couple of audience members screamed.
It's more silly than scary, but at least it's better than the original. Even so, the whole
killer-menaces-teenager-on-the-telephone thing was done SO much better in
Scream that I wonder why they even
attempted it. Seriously, how could someone make this film in the deep, dark shadow of
that 1996 masterwork, is beyond me. You can't tell me they haven't seen it, or weren't
ripping it off, either. I mean, at one point, our heroine asks the killer-on-phone, "What
do you want?" and he replies, "Your blood, all over me." Kevin Williamson must be
rolling in his grave.
Once again, we've got a PG-13 horror film, and while that sometimes works (The
Ring and Emily Rose
and Grudge and Sixth
Sense were all PG-13), it didn't in this case. The kills are sanitary and bloodless,
the ending is cowardly, and of course the children are in no real danger (nor do they
appear to be scared . . . you can see them scampering along, trying hard not to look at
the camera, while the sounds of their screams are looped in), but hey, if it were any other
way, that might shock someone. And nobody goes to horror movies to be shocked, right?
I didn't recognise the cast (except for the killer, who was in Gladiator and was
Lance Henriksen on the phone). The girl (Camilla Belle), while pretty enough, was
neither personable not likable in the slightest. She wasn't the dumbest horror movie
character we've ever seen, but judging from the jeers she got in the audience for her
behaviour, she may be the dumbest one of the 21st Century.
I used to consider myself something of a screenwriter, and I often said, "There's nothing
wrong with a character talking to themselves to make a point. I mean, I talk to myself
all the time." Now that I've seen this movie, with the girl saying things like, "The
guesthouse?" and "He called the wrong phone!" I now know how wrong I was. Sorry,
Uncle Jim, I guess I wasted that college money you left me after all.
The ending is completely ripped off that of Carrie,
but not nearly as well (even so, I sort of like the girl's last line). As I said in my last rant
against remakes, the suits behind this picture know damn well that no kid under twenty
has seen Carrie (or if they have, they're hopin' it was the slick 21st Century
remake, right?), and if they were bothered by the weak film or weak ending of the
movie, audience members would be too late to warn anybody anyhow.
I shouldn't rant about a film like this, since it's pretty harmless, but I will anyway. About
eighty percent of horror films are not screened for critics before they open, because a)
they know Horror fans don't read reviews, b) they know Horror fans will go on opening
weekend just because it's a horror film, and c) because if they let critics review it, they
know they would get a terrible review. But I say, Why not make a GOOD horror movie?
That way, you wouldn't have to worry about showing it to critics? Wouldn't it feel good
to get a recommendation from Jeffrey Lyons or Peter Travers or the ghost of Gene Siskel?
Well, the answer is that the suits don't care about anything other than that opening weekend.
And I'm sure When A Stranger Calls 2006 will make back its production costs
in the next day and a half. So, it doesn't matter what the critics say. And it matters even
less what I say.
I'd Recommend It To: There's not much to recommend this film. Still, I'd rather see it
again than the Carol Kane version.
Posted: February 6, 2006
Total Skulls: Incomplete
Sequel | ![]() |
|
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ![]() |
|
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
Bad execution | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ![]() |
|
Power is cut | ![]() |
|
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ![]() |
|
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ![]() |
|
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ![]() |
|
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower/bath scene | ![]() |
|
Car stalls or won't start | ![]() |
|
Cat jumps out | ![]() |
|
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ![]() |
|
Dream sequence | ![]() |
|
Hallucination/Vision | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Warning goes unheeded | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
x years before/later | ||
Flashback sequence | ||
Dark and stormy night | ![]() |
|
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ![]() |
|
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ![]() |
|
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ![]() |
|
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending | ||
What the hell? |